Going Out Of Business

My Dear Friends,

It is with great sadness that I must inform you I will no longer be updating this site.

Although I have been instructed by various sources to stop this work since I began, I initially chose to ignore those warnings. Unfortunately I can no longer do that.

If you read this site, then I'm sure you already realize you don't need me - you need YOU! My true intent has been to teach you how to empower yourself and not depend on others for your own state of health.

Unfortunately I will no longer be able to address your individual health concerns. I apologize for this and encourage you to search this site and those in the links section for the information you need.

There are many wonderful online sources of information, and this is just one of them. If this site is taken down at any time, it will not be by my doing. I promise that.

I'll soon be relocating to a place where I'll be perfectly safe and happy. You can read between the lines for the rest of the story.

I truly love you, and I'm sorry we live in such a world. Please don't feel abandoned, because I am taking you with me in my heart, and I will still think about you every day.

We all deserve to be safe, healthy and happy. Everything you need to know about how to get there is right at your fingertips. It has truly been an honor to be part of your journey in getting there.

Thank you for your love and support,

Nurse Olivia

Martin's 2nd Care Package

I was just packing up some nutritional products that I'm taking to 3 people with cancer on Sunday, and I thought I'd snap a photo for you.

These 3 people are all Americans living overseas, and I know of other recent cancer diagnoses involving Americans currently living in Israel as well. Remarkably, I knew most of them before their recent diagnoses.

We Americans better wake up, because "the terrorists" aren't nearly the threat to us that we are to ourselves.

Yes we were injected with cancer-causing viruses in our vaccines, yes we were raised on processed foods with addictive, cancer-causing additives, yes they are putting fluoride in the water, spraying us with chemtrails, and killing all of the nutrition in our produce through fertilizers, pesticides and irradiation, but you can overcome all of this and more by taking some simple steps.

If you need a gentle start, getting your nutrition through high quality supplements is not a radical lifestyle change, and once they begin giving you more energy, you might find yourself wanting to exercise, as well as losing those unhealthy cravings.

Nearly everything in this photo is going to Martin, the man with metastatic cancer whom I recently collected donations for. He recently completed 30 days of U-Fn and a few bottles of chlorophyll, so it's time for a refill. (I am using nutritional products with Martin rather than the disease-fighting machines I mentioned in my first post about him, as this turned out to be the most appropriate action to take.)

This time I am supplying him with Modifilan rather than U-Fn. It's more cost effective and I'm also being cautious about hitting his system with too much U-Fn since it's so highly concentrated, as based on my experience with fucoidan, it's possible that a lot of healing has already taken place from the past month of U-Fn. (Fucoidan is one of at least 3 cancer-fighting properties found in both Modifilan and U-Fn.) Until he has more tests I won't know that for sure, so I simply had to make a judgment call based on what I've seen with others in the past.

There are studies that show precautions should be used with supplements when addressing cancer, and I've seen numerous people recover using a strength of fucoidan even weaker than that found in the Modifilan that he'll be taking now, so I believe this is the right way to go until there are test results to go by.

I'm also taking 10 bottles of chlorophyll to him this time. Chlorophyll oxygenates the blood which is very important, as cancer cells can only survive in an environment that is deprived of oxygen. There are other ways to oxygenate the cells and there are natural cancer therapies that don't focus on doing this at all, however this is one of a number of effective approaches to overcoming cancer.

Dogs eat grass when they have cancer because they instinctively know they need the chlorophyll, and as animals are so much more in touch with these things than we are, it's sometimes a good thing to follow their lead. Chlorophyll is what gives plants their green color, to give you an idea of which vegetables you can find it in. Green leafy veggies are popular in part due to this.

I can't begin to tell you how grateful Martin is for your help. He was so excited when we spoke today and I reminded him of the success I've seen in people who cured their cancer using products similar to those pictured above.

Of course I tell him I can't make him any promises, and I want you to know that I can't make you any promises as well, but based on scientific research I can say I would take similar action if I found myself in the same position.

I do personally believe based on experience that Martin is going to do well, but again, no promises. He has a great chance, because he's doing more for his health than anyone else I've ever guided. He eagerly takes notes and puts into practice nearly everything I advise him on.

He has made some compromises on things that I've told him are important, but I also tell him that what he chooses to do is his decision. I don't put pressure on anyone to do it "my way" - I simply tell them what the research shows, and then it's up to them to choose whether or not to follow it.

If I ever sound like I'm giving you an ultimatum when I write, please forgive me. My passion to educate may come through as a dictate at times, but that's not my true intent at all. We all have the right to decide for ourselves which path in life to follow.

There are other people who have contacted me asking for help with buying their products, and I wish I could do that, but the response was not great enough in Martin's case that I feel confident enough to open the offer to others. Modifilan is only about $25/bottle if you can't afford U-Fn, and with the price of gas these days, it's cheaper than driving to your doctor's office ;) If you're in the US, you'll get free 2-3 day shipping from the vendor I order from.

Today I asked Martin about getting a PSA (a blood test that monitors prostate cancer) to be able to track his progress as he continues taking these products, even though his cancer has spread to the lymph. That's when he told me that his last PSA was the highest his doctor had ever seen in anyone. He has records of his lab tests and the elevating numbers prior to beginning the products and other advice I've been giving him, so next time he gets tested, we will have a good indication of how well this treatment is working.

(For the best way to detect the presence of cancer and judge the effectiveness of your cancer treatment, see Test Detects Cancer YEARS BEFORE Mainstream Medicine.)

I have done a lot of teaching with Martin both over the phone and the last time I traveled to meet with him. I will be sharing all we've covered in future posts. For now, here is a picture of Martin doing what he loves best, from our last visit.


I will send him your regards and wishes for a complete recovery when I see him on Sunday.

Have a great weekend!

Nurse Olivia

Why I Left Mainstream Medicine - The Movie

For those who haven't seen this video yet, you might like to. I made it to communicate the message that medicine is not an industry with your best interest in mind.

If you like it, you might also enjoy other videos from my YouTube channel.

Empower yourself by taking your health into your own hands!

:)


*If Vid Won't Play, Click Here.

I'm happy to say that this vid just passed 20,000 views on YouTube. Thank you everyone for helping spread the message.

Nurse Olivia

Cosmetics: Organ Damage, Birth Defects & Cancer - Ask Nurse Olivia

Now here is a great question from a reader:

"Is this makeup okay? These are the ingredients. Thank you!"

This woman is paying attention to what she puts on her body. What we put on our skin goes right into our bloodstream and does effect our health, including makeup, fragrances, deodorant and even shampoo, so this is very important.

So how do you know which cosmetics are safe and which are fatally flawed?

That's easy, thanks to the Environmental Working Group (EWG).

EWG has compiled a guide of thousands of cosmetics, personal care products, fragrances and even baby products ranked according to their potential to cause cancer, trigger allergic reactions, interfere with hormones, impair reproduction and damage the unborn.

Some additional product categories are skin care (including baby powder, shaving cream, deodorant and bandages), hair care (includes dyes and chemical treatments), eye care (such as contact lens solution) and all types of oral care, which is a great way to find an acceptable toothpaste.

In just 4 years, their "Skin Deep" database has had over 63 million searches!

This particular reader is asking about cosmetics from Bare Minerals. I remember seeing their commercials and being impressed with the idea of makeup that is "safe to sleep in."

Although EWG doesn't have the Bare Minerals brand listed in their cosmetics database, I did a search of the ingredients listed at the Bare Minerals website, and I found that all of them carry low-level health risks:

Titanium Dioxide

Zinc Oxide

Mica

Iron Oxide

Bismuth Oxychloride

There are products listed in the cosmetics database that score 0 risk, however a score of "0" can still mean low risk as opposed to none at all, so click on the product to read the details and see if one of the risk factors has a check mark.

I certainly wouldn't sleep in Bare Minerals makeup after researching the ingredients. There are other brands that contain a lower risk score.

In addition, Bare Minerals has a foundation with SPF 15 "sun protection," but this usually means that only the healthiest rays of the sun are blocked, while harmful ultraviolet rays are allowed in. Ironically this also stops the body from producing vitamin D, which prevents at least 77% of all cancers. This is a dangerous situation that greatly increases the risk of cancer, contrary to false advertising that claims to lower cancer risk.


Did you ever wonder what else the Avon lady had in her bag? If you'd rather not know, don't click here! Avon products range from 0-10 on the danger scale.

Here's how some other popular cosmetics companies rate, with 0 being low risk and 10 being the most unsafe:

Mary Kay: "Enriching Women's Lives" on a scale of 3-8.

"Maybe it's Maybelline?" It might be, if it rates 1-7.

Cover Girl: An "easy, breezy, beautiful" 2-7.

L'oreal: "Because you're worth it!" Isn't your life worth more than a risk of 1-10?

L'oreal for Kids: They think the kids are worth a risk of 4-9.

Revlon: "Twist, glide and shine" from 1-10.

YOU CAN HAVE IT ALL!

Now let's have some fun. I decided to go to the far end of the danger spectrum to find out which products rate a "perfect 10." I found a line of cosmetics called "You Can Have It All":


You can have it all! Cancer, developmental and reproductive toxicity, allergies/immunotoxicity, and more!

FRAGRANCES

Feeling obsessed?

Obsession for Women by Calvin Klein ranks 9 out of a possible 10 for potential health risks.

You can search the EWG database for fragrances including perfumes, colognes and body sprays.

ORAL CARE

Let's take a look at what the database has to say about one of your dentist's favorite chemical compounds, sodium fluoride.

Rat poison is straight sodium fluoride, and it's also used as termite pest control and roach spray. This is why toothpaste labels in the US carry a warning to call poison control immediately if more than the amount needed for brushing is swallowed. (This warning is not used in all countries, but the same risk applies.)

Here are the health risks of sodium fluoride according to EWG:


Cancer, developmental/reproductive toxicity, nerve and organ damage, hormonal disruption and more, including "...tumor formation at low doses... brain and nervous system effects at very low doses." But hey, your teeth look great!

Just kidding.

When you brush with fluoride, it's easily absorbed through the soft tissues of your mouth right into your system. It also causes gum disease.

(To read about the effects of drinking fluoride in water and consuming it in foods, click here to search all posts on this blog pertaining to fluoride.)

Some of you are buying "all-natural" toothpastes at the health food store, but what are you getting? Read the labels, because some of them contain fluoride and are not safe or natural.

Two very popular brands of toothpaste in the natural health community are Jason, which rates 1-4 on the EWG scale, and Tom's of Maine, which has been quietly owned by Colgate for 2 years now and rates 1-5. (I'm certain that many people would stop buying Tom's if they knew who had purchased it.)

There are better options at the health food store than these popular ones. Some people brush with baking soda and others add peroxide for whitening, but I prefer all-natural toothpaste.

Find a safe, fluoride-free toothpaste, or you could just buy insecticide and save yourself the trouble. Killing the bacteria on your teeth with rat poison will do the same thing to you over time. Also, avoid processed sugar as much as possible for the best way to care for your teeth.

Other dental products include fluoride as well, such as mouth wash and dental floss, so make sure you look into all your oral care products to make the safest choices.

Thanks for your great question. This is an important topic that most people are completely unaware of.

* About "Ask Nurse Olivia"

Ask Nurse Olivia is a feature of my blog, Red Pill Reich, as well as Truth Brigade Radio.

Questions are selected and posted on both sites. Names and email addresses are removed, and you will be notified if your question is chosen.

Questions should be submitted to:

TruthBrigadeRadio@gmail.com with "Ask Nurse Olivia" in the subject line.

If your question isn't picked, I will do my best to answer it anyway, but so many people are writing to me that I have to prioritize, so I apologize if you don't get an answer. Please visit the websites below if you can't find helpful info at my blog:

- General Health Sites

Dr. Joseph Mercola

Natural News - Featuring Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.

Dr. McDougall

- Cancer Info

If I had cancer, I would take U-Fn and visit the Gerson Clinic. If I didn't have money for either of those, I would take Modifilan and visit the first site listed below.

More cancer resources:

Cancer Tutor - Hundreds of natural cancer cures by a bona fide cancer researcher.

Gerson Therapy - Vegetable juicing to overcome chronic illnesses, including cancer.

Dr. Lorraine Day - Has excellent videos explaining that the cancer industry is a corrupt business. Dr. Day also tells her story of how she overcame cancer by juicing vegetables.

If it's an urgent situation and you don't have time to do cancer research, try getting a consult with Ralph Moss, PhD.

I appreciate your support and applaud your efforts in educating yourself about your health.

Remember, no one will ever care more about your health than you!

Nurse Olivia

Some Brain Surgeons Don't Hold Cell Phones To Their Brains

Three prominent neurosurgeons declared on Larry King Live that they don't hold cell phones to their ears because they believe they're dangerous. So of course the New York Times came to the rescue of cell phone makers with an article containing mixed information, entirely watering down the message.

Even Senator Kennedy was recently diagnosed with a cancerous glioma, a tumor in the brain stem that is associated with cell phones.

Keep in mind that everything written in this post about cell phones applies to cordless home phones as well, because they use the same frequency and therefore cause the same damage:

"All modern (DECT) digital cordless phones emit the same type of pulsed microwave radiation (about 1.8 GHz) as ordinary (GSM) mobile phones."

Even though the brain surgeons quoted below were bold enough to speak out on CNN, they seem to be unaware that most headsets actually magnify the effects of cell phone radiation by causing it to travel up the wire and enter the brain in a concentrated amount in one small area.

Therefore it's important not to use an ordinary headset, but rather one designed to stop radiation from traveling up the cord, such as Blue Tube. A ferrite bead wrapped around the cord helps even further. The Cell Phone Protector, a small disc that sticks to the back of the phone, also works well at blocking radiation (I tested it, in addition to the fact that it has been independently tested and proven to work).

Here is a comprehensive, detailed and well-referenced article on the dangers of cell phones featuring 2 reports from The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal:

If Mobile Phones Were a Type of Food, They Simply Would Not be Licensed

If you are concerned about your radiation exposure from cell phones, computers and x-rays, I take Modifilan and calcium bentonite clay, which are superior at safely removing radiation as well as heavy metals.

There are a few things from the NYT article below that objective research agrees with. Using the speaker phone as much as possible to avoid radiation exposure to the brain is a good idea. Also, one doctor below expresses concern for children using cell phones, and children's use of cell phones and wireless devices has indeed been proven to be far more damaging than that of adults, due to their developing brains.

The following piece from the New York Times is nothing more than an attempt to support their advertisers...

Experts Revive Debate Over Cellphones and Cancer
By TARA PARKER-POPE

What do brain surgeons know about cellphone safety that the rest of us don’t?

Last week, three prominent neurosurgeons told the CNN interviewer Larry King that they did not hold cellphones next to their ears. “I think the safe practice,” said Dr. Keith Black, a surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, “is to use an earpiece so you keep the microwave antenna away from your brain.”

Dr. Vini Khurana, an associate professor of neurosurgery at the Australian National University who is an outspoken critic of cellphones, said: “I use it on the speaker-phone mode. I do not hold it to my ear.” And CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a neurosurgeon at Emory University Hospital, said that like Dr. Black he used an earpiece.

Along with Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s recent diagnosis of a glioma, a type of tumor that critics have long associated with cellphone use, the doctors’ remarks have helped reignite a long-simmering debate about cellphones and cancer.

That supposed link has been largely dismissed by many experts, including the American Cancer Society. The theory that cellphones cause brain tumors “defies credulity,” said Dr. Eugene Flamm, chairman of neurosurgery at Montefiore Medical Center.

According to the Food and Drug Administration, three large epidemiology studies since 2000 have shown no harmful effects. CTIA — the Wireless Association, the leading industry trade group, said in a statement, “The overwhelming majority of studies that have been published in scientific journals around the globe show that wireless phones do not pose a health risk.”


The F.D.A. notes, however, that the average period of phone use in the studies it cites was about three years, so the research doesn’t answer questions about long-term exposures. Critics say many studies are flawed for that reason, and also because they do not distinguish between casual and heavy use.

Cellphones emit non-ionizing radiation, waves of energy that are too weak to break chemical bonds or to set off the DNA damage known to cause cancer. There is no known biological mechanism to explain how non-ionizing radiation might lead to cancer.

But researchers who have raised concerns say that just because science can’t explain the mechanism doesn’t mean one doesn’t exist. Concerns have focused on the heat generated by cellphones and the fact that the radio frequencies are absorbed mostly by the head and neck. In recent studies that suggest a risk, the tumors tend to occur on the same side of the head where the patient typically holds the phone.

Like most research on the subject, the studies are observational, showing only an association between cellphone use and cancer, not a causal relationship. The most important of these studies is called Interphone, a vast research effort in 13 countries, including Canada, Israel and several in Europe.

Some of the research suggests a link between cellphone use and three types of tumors: glioma; cancer of the parotid, a salivary gland near the ear; and acoustic neuroma, a tumor that essentially occurs where the ear meets the brain. All these cancers are rare, so even if cellphone use does increase risk, the risk is still very low.

Last year, The American Journal of Epidemiology published data from Israel finding a 58 percent higher risk of parotid gland tumors among heavy cellphone users. Also last year, a Swedish analysis of 16 studies in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine showed a doubling of risk for acoustic neuroma and glioma after 10 years of heavy cellphone use.

“What we’re seeing is suggestions in epidemiological studies that have looked at people using phones for 10 or more years,” says Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News, an industry publication that tracks the research. “There are some very disconcerting findings that suggest a problem, although it’s much too early to reach a conclusive view.”

Some doctors say the real concern is not older cellphone users, who began using phones as adults, but children who are beginning to use phones today and face a lifetime of exposure.

“More and more kids are using cellphones,” said Dr. Paul J. Rosch, clinical professor of medicine and psychiatry at New York Medical College. “They may be much more affected. Their brains are growing rapidly, and their skulls are thinner.”

For people who are concerned about any possible risk, a simple solution is to use a headset. Of course, that option isn’t always convenient, and some critics have raised worries about wireless devices like the Bluetooth that essentially place a transmitter in the ear.

The fear is that even if the individual risk of using a cellphone is low, with three billion users worldwide, even a minuscule risk would translate into a major public health concern.


“We cannot say with any certainty that cellphones are either safe or not safe,” Dr. Black said on CNN. “My concern is that with the widespread use of cellphones, the worst scenario would be that we get the definitive study 10 years from now, and we find out there is a correlation.”

(To see this article in its original location, click here.)

Nurse Olivia

New Israeli Radar Sees Through Walls

It's not new for governments and security services to be able to see us through walls, but for some reason they want us to think it is.

They commonly release information on "new" technology into the media after they have been using it for many years already, according to the many different insiders who regularly appear on Truth Brigade Radio. While it's possible that this particular radar is new, the ability to see through walls is not. I have seen images of such technology as well as heard about it on Truth Brigade.

As usual, this technological breakthrough is being reported as "good for you," just like vaccines.

New Israeli radar can see through walls

In a development that conjures up images of comic book superheroes, Israeli technology firm Camero has successfully created a portable radar system that allows its users to literally see through walls, reported Israeli business newspaper The Marker.

The radar uses a new technology known as Ultra Wide Band (UWB) to detect and create a relatively accurate image of people or objects on the far side of walls and other solid masses.

Camero officials expect their new device to be a major asset in the hands of Israeli military special forces and search and rescue crews.

(To see this article in its original location, click here.)

Nurse Olivia

South Africa Bans AIDS Vitamin Trials

South Africa receives billions of dollars in US aid for the purpose of "treating" AIDS, and therefore a lot of money would be lost if word got around that nutritional products can actually cure AIDS, as opposed to AIDS drugs which have been proven not to lengthen lifespan.

South African President Thabo Mbeki has been saying publicly for years that AIDS patients need nutrition rather than pharmaceutical drugs. He has been highly criticized for this, of course, and as you'll read below, there is great resistance to this line of thought.

I have seen nutrition cure AIDS patients, but it needs to be high quality nutrition, including superior nutritional supplements such as U-Fn.

South African court bans AIDS vitamin trials
Fri 13 Jun 2008, 13:14 GMTcc

CAPE TOWN (Reuters) - A South African court on Friday issued an order banning unauthorised clinical trials of vitamin therapies for AIDS conducted by a team including a former adviser to President Thabo Mbeki.

The Cape High Court ruled against German physician Matthias Rath and U.S. doctor David Rasnick, a former member of Mbeki's AIDS advisory council, in response to a case brought by the lobby group Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and the South African Medical Association (SAMA).

The two bodies accused Rath of conducting illegal clinical trials among poor blacks and profiteering by selling and distributing unregistered vitamin treatments among poor communities.

"It is declared that the clinical trials conducted in South Africa ... are unlawful," Cape High Court Judge Dumisani Zondi said in his ruling.

South Africa has one of the world's highest incidences of HIV, with an estimated 500,000 people infected each year. About 1,000 die every day from AIDS-related illnesses.

Rath and his Rath Foundation promote vitamin pills and micronutrients, mainly minerals such as iron or iodine, that they say can reverse the course of HIV/AIDS.

Critics say Rath's work has led to unnecessary deaths when HIV-positive people stopped using life-saving anti-retroviral drugs.

In court papers, TAC and SAMA accused the South African government of not doing enough to stop Rath and failing in its constitutional and statutory duty of care to the public.

Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, who has herself courted controversy by advocating garlic and beetroot instead of anti-retroviral drugs, denied the allegations.

Tshabalala-Msimang and a senior Health Ministry official argued before the court that Rath's products were not really medicines but foodstuffs that were outside the Medicines Control Council's regulatory scope.

The court said on Friday that Rath and Rasnick, two of 12 people mentioned in the suit, would be prohibited from conducting unlawful clinical trials in South Africa or from publishing advertisements for their products.

(To see this article in its original location, click here.)

Nurse Olivia

San Diego Loses Anti-Fluoridation Battle

Disappointing, but not surprising.

Last Tuesday I published a post called San Diego Fluoride Debate + CDC WARNING. Thanks to a $3.9 million "gift," San Diego will soon be fluoridating the water of all counties which are not currently fluoridated.

The money came from the same county commission that allocates tobacco tax money and supports children's health initiatives. Does anyone else see the irony in that? I see how much they care about children's health!

Click the following to visit the City of San Diego Water Department. The section on fluoride has not been updated to reflect Tuesday's developments as of this posting.

Click the following to search all posts on this blog pertaining to fluoride.

Below is an article summarizing Tuesday's events.

$3.9M gift means San Diego has to fluoridate
6/11/2008 3:32:26 PM

SAN DIEGO — The City Council here on June 10 had no choice but to accept a $3.9 million offer from the San Diego County-run First 5 Commission that would enable the city to comply with state regulations to fluoridate its drinking water, according to local reports.

Under a 1995 California law, all major water agencies are required to add fluoride to their supplies. San Diego was exempted because it didn’t have money to pay for it, and municipal code forbids using taxpayer money to cover the cost, according to a June 10 KPBS report.

County Supervisor Ron Roberts is chair of the First 5 Commission, which allocates the county’s tobacco tax money and supports children’s health intitiatives. He told KPBS, “Dental disease is the most common and preventable disease in infants and young children in San Diego county. Fluoridation is a safe and effective method in affecting dental disease.”

Fluoride opponents pressed the council to reject fluoridation of the city’s supply. Councilwoman Donna Frye suggested worried citizens lobby the state legislature, but added that the First 5 Commission’s gift left the council in a tight spot, KPBS reported.

“I don’t think we have a choice but to accept it. An offer has been made, the exemption has been removed, the law seems very clear,” Frye said.

The money will pay for the capital costs and two years of operating fluoridation. That leaves open the question of whether public money can be used to continue the program in the long term.

The mayor’s office now is charged with developing a timeline to begin the program, FOX 6 reported.

To read the full reports, click here or here.

(To see this article in its original location, click here.)

Nurse Olivia

Kidney Foundation Drops Fluoridation Support

I'm honored to have received a blog comment from the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, which has an amazing website as well as a blog called False Data that features false reports about fluoride being safe and preventing cavities.

They also link to A Bibliography of Scientific Literature on Fluoride, which is full of scientific and medical data. Someone worked very hard on this collection. If anyone thinks you're crazy for believing that a toxic waste like fluoride could actually have harmful effects when swallowed, this is a good place to send them, as well as Fluoride Action Network.

Below is an article that was posted on this blog as a comment by the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation.


Kidney Foundation Drops Fluoridation Support
Fluoride may damage bones of kidney patients

New York – June 9, 2008 – The National Kidney Foundation withdrew its support of water fluoridation citing the 2006 National Research Council (NRC) report indicating that kidney patients are more susceptible to fluoride’s bone and teeth-damaging effects.

The kidney-impaired retain more fluoride and risk skeletal fluorosis (an arthritic-type bone disease), fractures and severe enamel fluorosis, which may increase the risk of dental decay, reports the NRC.

Fluoride is added to US water supplies ostensibly to reduce tooth decay. Fluoride is also in foods, beverages, (1) drugs and dental products.

The National Kidney Foundation’s (NKF) (2) former fluoridation position statement also carried surprising cautions. The NKF advised monitoring children’s fluoride intake along with patients with chronic kidney impairment, those with excessive fluoride intake, and those with prolonged disease. But NKF now admits, “exposure from food and beverages is difficult to monitor, since FDA food labels do not quantify fluoride content.”

The NKF’s April 15, 2008 statement goes further: “Individuals with CKD [Chronic Kidney Disease] should be notified of the potential risk of fluoride exposure.”

“More than 20 million Americans have CKD, and most don’t even know it. More than 20 million others are at increased risk for developing CKD,” NKF reports.

“There is consistent evidence that impairment of kidney function results in changes to the way in which fluoride is metabolized and eliminated from the body, resulting in an increased burden of fluoride,” concludes Kidney Health Australia. (3) in a paper NKF recommends reading (4)

NKF’s fluoridation support was dropped when a lawyer, (5) an academic dentist and public health professional, Daniel Stockin, (6) alerted it to NRC’s findings.

“An easy way to reduce the uncontrolled flow of fluoride into our bodies is to stop water fluoridation,” says attorney Paul Beeber, President, New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation. “But it takes political will to reject fluoridation.”

The American and Louisiana Dental Associations (7,8) erroneously claim the National Kidney Foundation supports fluoridation. However, even the ADA reports (9) that “decreased fluoride removal may occur among persons with severely impaired kidney function who may not be on kidney dialysis.”

Chronic kidney disease is a growing health problem in the United States occurring more often in African-American populations, says the Centers for Disease Control. (10)

More fluoride/kidney information here.

SOURCE: NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc
PO Box 263
Old Bethpage, NY 11804


References:

1) USDA Fluoride in Foods Database.

2) National Kidney Foundation, “Fluoride Intake in Chronic Kidney Disease,” April 15, 2008.

3) Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, “Effects of fluoridation of community water supplies for people with chronic kidney disease,” (2007) 22: 2763–2767, Ludlow et al.

4) National Kidney Foundation, “Fluoride.”

5) September 18, 2007 letter, Reeves to National Kidney Foundation.

6) October, 2007 news release, “Did Kidney Foundation Leave Millions at Risk by Failing to Warn about Fluorides and Fluoridated Drinking Water?” by Daniel Stockin, MPH, The Lillie Center.

7) American Dental Association.

8) Louisiana Dental Association, “Health Smiles Coalition.”

9) American Dental Association, “Fluoridation Facts.”

10) U.S. Centers for Disease Control, MMWR “Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease and Associated Risk Factors" --- United States, 1999—2004.

Nurse Olivia

Ron Paul (Not) For President

On Wednesday I posted something about Congressman Ron Paul's run for president. On Thursday, he quit the race.

The dream lives on. He gives a message of hope to all of us on his website.

Even if you supported one of the other candidates who were also blacked out by the media, such as Dennis Kucinich, you probably believe in many of Ron Paul's ideals, such as restoring the Constitution and bringing the troops home from Iraq. Kucinich is trying to get Bush impeached right now, by the way, for falsifying the case to go to war with Iraq.

Regular readers know that I don't usually talk about politics on this blog, but the same people responsible for shredding the US Constitution are the same ones poisoning the masses with fluoride and ineffective vaccines, so in order to disable the medical mafia, we must disassemble the stranglehold of private bankers and corporate business over the US Government, most notably the control of the drug companies over the FDA.

You might wonder why I care so much about the US when I live in Israel. Well, I'm an American and lived there nearly my whole life. I care very deeply about what's happening there and to the people.

I am contacted by people from all over the world and do my best to help them all, but I know that the people controlling the US and Israeli Governments have especially evil plans for those countries. I want to help bring about change. The world at large is being poisoned, but to my knowledge, access to natural healing methods and accurate information is most censored by the US media.

It is the law in Israel, by the way, to fluoridate the water. As evil as many people believe Jews and Israelis are, believe me, the people here work hard and raise their families just like you. We are targeted by the Israeli Government, but you don't see it on the news the way you see their other activities. I want what's best for the Palestinians as an Israeli just as I want what's best for the American Indians as an American, and I don't agree with the treatment of either. They were dealt with wrongly before I was born, so I can't be blamed, but I can make a difference.

Never believe in a government. Believe in yourself, in those who love you, and in the One who created us all.

You can count me as someone who loves you.

:)

Stay tuned to Truth Brigade Radio and their archives to hear information you won't get anywhere else from New World Order insiders. Christie gets amazing guests to come on the show. When you hear the same things from so many different sources, it can't be denied. Make sure you check out the Truth Brigade calendar to find the shows that interest you the most.

REVOLUTION IS COMING! Believe we can make a difference, and we will.

Nurse Olivia